|
Re: The Efficacy of Radiotherapy By Don Benjamin
From: jdrew63929@aol.com (Jan Drew)
On Aug 26, 4:50 pm, Mark STANLEY Probert <mark.prob...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Aug 25, 7:39 pm, "carole" <hubbca2...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
"Peter B" <.@.> wrote in messagenews:4c757669$1@news.x-privat.org...
"john" <nos...@bt.com> wrote in message
news:mo6dnasSWe069-jRnZ2dnUVZ8hKdnZ2d@bt.com...
The Efficacy of Radiotherapy By Don Benjamin There has never been a
properly run randomised trial that showed that radiotherapy saved any
lives or even produced a significant increase in survival for any type of
cancer.
That is what the
problem is when you live by agenda, you see what you want and ignore the
rest. Including truth.
But yet it does say -
"For example a 1993 US study of the deaths of 470,000 cancer patients found
that about 27% of those who didn't die from their cancer had died from their
conventional cancer treatment that had mainly damaged the heart and
respiratory system (mainly radiotherapy and chemotherapy)1. The authors of
this study attributed the deaths to treatment because most of the extra
deaths occurred in the year just after diagnosis."
The key word, for the functional illiterates, is *attributed*. This
"study" found a temporal connection, not one of causality. The writer
of the article is full of crap.
Here is the study:
Poor shouting Mark Stanley Probert.
Now Pan Pharmaceuticals never had one death from their products, yet they
were made bankrupt by Australia's TGA.
What's wrong with that picture?
carole- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
|
