|
Re: The Efficacy of Radiotherapy By Don Benjamin
From: .@. (Peter B)
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote in message news:6npd765sfuje4ovfjee6gfm362aj20cog1@4ax.com...
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:12:44 -0700, in misc.health.alternative,
"Peter B" <.@.> wrote:
"CSM" <csm7532@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4f02992f-84f1-45c8-a621-9ca998f9f480@i13g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 25, 5:56 pm, "Peter B" <.@.> wrote:
<snip>
You did notice that it stated ?1993"? Old stats, very old. Old
technologies.
See my note.
This made me laugh. So 1993 is "very old"? The funny part is that I
don't actually disagree. In terms of cancer care, 17 years is a long
time. I wouldn't be surprised if the treatment for colon cancer is
now better than when I was diagnosed, a mere 4 years ago; it's
certainly better than it was in the early '90s. Of course, I could
have tried the alternatives: going barefoot, using a lot of cannabis,
drinking onion juice, and smacking bottles of water against a piece of
leather to invoke the magic in it. But if I'd gone that route, I
wouldn't be laughing at Peter's post.
Keep it up Peter. Even if you never change a closed mind, you can
amuse and inform open ones.
Thank you, I got quite a laugh out of your well written post too.
Yes, technologies change fast. I couldn't even begin to describe on paper
the history of some of these devices, let alone the new ones out there. Like
a Gamma Knife for brain surgery.
That is simply amazing. the speed which that technology has spread,
and the availability at a reasonable cost is a sign of Technological
Advancement. What appears in research as a small step ends up being a
giant stride forward.
Yes, really amazing when one steps back and ponders it all.
|
