|
Re: Jobo atl3
From: Darkroom.User.6aac4e8@photobanter.com (Darkroom User)
David Nebenzahl;886997 Wrote:
On 8/12/2010 12:15 AM Darkroom User spake thus:
[i]
David Nebenzahl;886934 Wrote:
[color=green][i]
IanG;886420 Wrote:
I was being sarcastic, but I do take your concerns seriously. My serious
answer to your queries about pyro developers is really "don't bother".
It's not worth the hassle. You can get wonderful results using any of an
array of readily-available conventional developers. So unless you insist
on doing something peculiar, boutique-y and idiosyncratic, stick with
D-76/ID-11, Microdol-X, Xtol, etc.
By the way, just curious: what's with the strange quoting style you used
(putting previously-quoted material in ALL CAPS, with non-functional
"tags", like )? That in itself is kinda like using pyro. I'm
just saying ...
--
The fashion in killing has an insouciant, flirty style this spring,
with the flaunting of well-defined muscle, wrapped in flags.
- Comment from an article on Antiwar.com ()I am posting through the Photo-Banter site:
and those "tags" come up when I reply, although I do highlight certain
quotes in bold type.
By posting through this site, it helps to prevent receiving spam emails,
although I am not sure if I am getting to read all of the replies to the
threads.
Thank you for your reasonable reply to stick with regular developers. I
was curious to know why some people use pyro developers instead of
normal non staining developers and what they perceive their advantages
to be.
I am here to learn from the more experienced photographers and darkroom
users. :-)
--
Darkroom User
|
