|
Re: homosexual Marriage: Who Cares?
From: jennconductsREMOVETHIS@mac.com (Jenn)
In article <9htd76lulep5ob2l6fibsbgjout0d2271l@4ax.com>,
flipper <flipper@fish.net> wrote:
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:41:47 -0700, Jenn
<jennconductsREMOVETHIS@mac.com> wrote:
In article <4c76d51a.153638770@news.eternal-september.org>,
spam@spam.com (Don Pearce) wrote:
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:47:42 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@removethishotmail.com> wrote:
Soundhaspriority ( the real one ? )wrote:
Even worse, we shouldn't have a system where people with defective genes
(the homos) are reproducing using these defective genes by artificial
means,
or otherwise.
I know there's a 'redhead gene' but one for homosexuality ? How about
bisexuals too ? False argument methinks.
Graham
A gene for homosexuality would disappear from the pool pretty quickly,
one would imagine. A bit like a gene for infertility.
d
That might be true if homosexual people never parented children.
Not really because it could be recessive.
True.
| Subject |
| |
|